![]() Even experienced engineers would apply the provisions incorrectly. In the past, ASCE had given out some mock tests to volunteer engineers of all levels with a simple building and they were asked to come up with the loads on the building. Counter-intuitive as it may seem because it is now spread out over many more chapters, I think the committee did a fairly good job of guiding the engineer through the provisions in a logical way. I know it's a pain initially, but this is one of the code changes that I think simplified things a bit (I know I'm likely in the minority here). I can assure you they do this because they are genuinely interested in furthering knowledge and the topics in which they specialize. I was fortunate enough to attend a University that is involved in a lot of structural engineering research, and quite a few of my professors were members (even chairmen) of some of these committees (not the ASCE-7 wind loading committee). I think you greatly overestimate the compensation these folks receive for the thankless work they do. Because I suspect the same people (not naming names) would then complain about the non-uniformity of the code in coastal areas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |